Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

However, as to Defendant B, this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are married and are not separately treated with narcotics.

1. Defendant A

A. On December 18, 2016, around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) administered me by inserting the Memptopy (one philopon) of approximately 0.03g, which is a local mental medicine, into a single-use injection instrument; and (b) injection into the arms after dilution.

B. On December 19, 2016, around 19:40 on December 19, 2016, the Defendant filed a lawsuit in a manner of keeping approximately 0.23g of opphones by dividing them into two in a single-use injection machine.

2. Defendant B administered approximately 0.03g of philopon A at the same time and at the same place as the above 1-A, in a manner that allows A to inject the Defendant’s arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Seizure records;

1. A criminal investigation report (at least once 25);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each letter of narcotic appraisal;

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. under the relevant Act on criminal facts (or choice of imprisonment);

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant B) of the suspended execution;

1. Sentencing Criteria provided for in the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. by Additional Collection;

가. 피고인 A : 징역 1년 하한 ☞ 필로폰 투약 가중영역 (3 년 이내 집행유예 이상 동종 전과) 의 하한 인 징역 1년을 전체 하한으로 하고, 다수범죄 처리기준 적용

나. 피고인 B : 징역 10월 하한 ☞ 필로폰 투약 기본영역 피고인 A의 경우 동종 범행으로 집행유예기간 중임에도 다시 이 사건 범행을 저지른 점이나 그 시간적 간격, 재범의 위험성 등을 종합하여 실형을, 피고인 B에 대하여는 초범인 점 등을 고려하여 집행유예를 각 선택하되, 기록과 변론에 나타난 범행 경위, 반성태도 등 여러 정상을 아울러 참작하여 각 양형기준 범위 내에서 주문과 같이 형을 정함