logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.06.26 2015고정367
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant acting as the president of the F&N partnership, the victim G (the age of 61), H (the age of 65), and I (the age of 57) are directors of each such partnership, the victim J (the age of 56), K (the age of 73), and L (the age of 60), who are responsible for audit of each such partnership.

1. On August 4, 2014, the Defendant posted a title "3,00,000 won-2,000 won as a result of the prosecution investigation" on "On the Internet next Kafest Development Cooperative" (hereinafter referred to as "F Redevelopment Cooperative") around 10:56 on August 4, 2014, the Defendant posted a title "3,00,000 won-2,000 won-2,000 won-2,000 as a result of the prosecution investigation of the police prosecutor's office for about 4 months, for the police prosecutor's investigation results (one person), three (3), one (1), one (1), and (1) of the members (one (one) on July 20, 2014; the two (2) was finally prosecuted; and (3) on August 4, 2014, the Defendant sent a mobile phone text message to the victim's association on July 29, 2014 to the public use of the aforementioned mobile text message.

2. On August 9, 2014, the Defendant sent a text message to the effect that, at around 10:45 on August 9, 2014, at the foregoing association office located in Gwangju Mine-gu M and the first floor, the auditors who misrepresented to the said association by means of computers were given notice to the 103 representatives of the said association that they would hold the board of representatives at the request of representatives. The Defendant, whenever he misrepresented to the association, is tried to protect the maintenance company until the end of the persons who were punished by a fine from the former prosecutor’s office. The Defendant continued to send a text message to the effect that, at around 11:42 on August 16, 2014, those forces opposing the said association were opened by the end of the maintenance company, not by the formal board of representatives of the association, but by the board of representatives to protect the maintenance company. However, there is no legal effect and there is no basis for the maintenance company and its power.

arrow