A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Seized evidence Nos. 1 and 2 shall be confiscated from the accused.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2016, the Defendant is found to have carried a pipe (76 cm in length, 8.5 cm in diameter) in Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, Jin-si, D on August 21, 2016, and he does not operate his business.

For reasons that it still is operating, the victim F, who is an employee working in that place ( South, 37 years old); and

After the sound, the part of the victim’s arms was cut one time with the hack pipe, the victim’s hair, body, bridge, etc. continued to fall 15 times in the hack pipe, and the victim was collected once in each head of the damaged person, and the victim was injured by two hacks that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. The Defendant damaged property at a time, at the same time, at a place as in paragraph 1, as above, and at the same time and at the same place as above, destroyed the victim G’s market price owned by the said “E F” by gathering one minute of the unfolded fire in the market price of the victim G, which was located in the said “E F,” and then damaged the victim’s property by gathering the victim’s computer monitor and this body 7 sets up on the floor at the market price of KRW 4.2 million owned by the victim, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs, death diagnosis certificates, and written estimates;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act, and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. There are many criminal records on the grounds of sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act, and the fact that the instant crime was committed again without being aware of during the suspension period of execution due to the same kind of crime, and the damage was not recovered entirely.