A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. A special intimidation: (a) around October 27, 2018, the Defendant: (b) sought food knife (32cm in length, 19.5cm in length, 19.5cm in length) that was dangerous in the Defendant’s accommodation, and (c) sought food knife (32cm in length, 19.5cm in length) that was dangerous in the Defendant’s accommodation, on the ground that he/she had his/her wife C and knife with his/her wife C and neglected the Defendant’s marriage with his/her wife D (31 years of age). (d) At around 17:00 on the same day, the Defendant sought food knife (32cm in length, 19.5cm in length, knife in the Korean language to the victim who was hidden in the toilet.

Nara refers to "Nara", and as a result, the toilets were scarbed in several times, and the toilets were threatened with harm to the victim.

2. On October 27, 2018, at the house of the victim D, as described in paragraph (1) around 17:00, the Defendant damaged the victim’s property by cutting down the toilet door in a knife, which is a dangerous object, and cutting down a knife, which is a knife, when threatening the victim, and cutting down the toilet door on the toilet door, cutting down a knife, cutting off the knife, and cutting down the knife on the window. The Defendant damaged the victim’s property by cutting up the knife and knife on the floor and destroying the knife joint equipment on the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F or D;

1. Application of the police seizure protocol and the statutes on the list of seizure;

1. Relevant provisions of Articles 284, 283 (1) (special intimidation), 369, and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense (or choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the ground that Article 48(1)1 of the Criminal Act of the Confiscation Act (the Defendant did not have a criminal record, the crime of this case is considerably intentional, and the fear of fear by the victim was committed as a crime carrying dangerous articles, and the agreement is reached with the victim) is above Article 48(1)1.