logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2013.6.27.선고 2013도4995 판결
병역법위반
Cases

2013Do4995 Violation of the Military Service Act

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Appellant

Defendant

Defense Counsel

Attorney E (Korean National Assembly Line)

Judgment of the lower court

Gwangju District Court Decision 2013No61 Decided April 10, 2013

Imposition of Judgment

June 27, 2013

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

With respect to the so-called conscientious objection, the Constitutional Court decided that Article 88(1) of the Military Service Act, which is a provision punishing the act of evading enlistment, does not violate the Constitution (see, e.g., Constitutional Court Order 2002Hun-Ga1, Aug. 26, 2004; Constitutional Court Order 2008Hun-Ga22, Aug. 30, 201). The Supreme Court ruled that conscientious objection based on conscience does not constitute "justifiable cause" as a ground for exception to punishment under the above provision, and that the right to be exempt from the application of the above provision is not derived from the provision of Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in which Korea is a member of the Republic of Korea, and presented recommendations to the UN Commission on Freedom of Civil Service (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2004Do2965, Jul. 15, 2004; Supreme Court Decision 2007Do879, Aug. 17, 2007).

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Yang Chang-soo

Justices Park Byung-hee

Justices Ko Young-han

Justices Kim Jae-tae

arrow