logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.01.24 2018고단1146
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while driving a B taxi on November 16, 2016:55 and driving a DK5 car in the vicinity of the Seo-gu Seo-gu Seoul metropolitan model; (b) the victim E (23 years of age) who was driving a DK5 car behind the taxi, was dissatisfied with the Defendant’s repeated unnecessary operation of the taxi; and (c) the Defendant left the taxi on the road because the taxi was the victim and the Si expenses and left the taxi on the road; and (d) the Defendant has a dispute with the victim, who left the taxi on the road.

In order to attract the part of the victim as his hand, and assault the victim by making the face part of the victim's face one time by hand.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol with respect to the accused and E (including substitute part);

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The data attached to investigation report (Attachment of 112 Report Handling List) and transfer [the victim's statement was consistent from the investigative agency to this court; the defendant returned to his own car immediately after driving a taxi after leaving the scene; and the victim went away from the 112 before driving the taxi; and the victim's child-friendly district F was unable to clearly state that the victim's face was sealed as the victim's seat was kept away from the police at the time of driving the taxi; however, the victim's statement that the victim's face was unfolded by the police at the time of driving the taxi, unlike the police at the time of the crime, seems likely that the F who was present at the time when he refused summons of the witness after the crime and several times is likely to have bleepd the victim's dispute between the victim and others, or the victim's retaliation was likely to be taken differently from the police statement at the time of the police. Considering the fact that the F appears not to have observed all parts at the time, and that the victim returned to his own car to drive the defendant after leaving the scene.]

1. Criminal facts;

arrow