Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On February 26, 2020, at the C main point located in Sejong Special Self-Governing City on February 26, 2020, the Defendant received a report of 112 from the 1st of the disturbance, such as a defect in sitting in company with other customers under the influence of alcohol, and solicited the Defendant to return home from the E in the Sejong Special Self-Governing City D District Unit in the Sejong Special Self-Governing Police Station, and the police officer called out of the above main point, and when the Defendant saw the Defendant to “Iskicks if the police officers are the police officers,” the Defendant saw the Defendant to “Iskicks if the police officers are the police officers, she pushed the chest of the above F, and assaulted the chest of the above E with the hand-on part of the left face one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officials concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to internal investigation reports and investigation reports (C telephone call hearing on the counter party of the C business);

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the order of provisional payment is that it is not good for the defendant to commit the crime by assaulting police officers who called out to the scene of the fluence.

In particular, the crime of obstruction of the performance of official duties needs to be punished as a crime prejudicial to the function of the state by nullifying the legitimate exercise of public authority.

The degree of force that the defendant used to police officers is not easy, and the defendant has been punished once for the crime of injury.

The defendant did not receive a letter from the damaged police officers up to now.

However, it is against the defendant's wrong recognition.

On the other hand, there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding the same kind or fine.

Such circumstances and the defendant's age, character and behavior, and