beta
Text
Defendant
A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 5,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.
The Defendants respectively.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On December 5, 2015, the Defendants jointly committed the crimes of the Defendants: (a) on the street in front of “D cafeteria” located in Ansan-si, Ansan-si; (b) on the street in front of the “D cafeteria” located in Ansan-si; and (c) on the part of the Defendant B, the Defendant B, who was a police official belonging to the E District Police Team in the Ansan-gu, Police Station E District of the Ansan-gu, Police Station, sent the Defendant A, who was seated on the lane while under the influence of alcohol, was forced to go to the delivery of the police; and (b) the said police officer again prevented the Defendants from moving the vehicle without any particular reason; and (c) the Defendant A tried to take the Defendant’s cell phone by a police officer from F to take the mobile phone; and (d) the Defendant A assaulted the Defendant by brea-man with his hand.
Defendant B continuously reported that Defendant A was arrested as an offender in the act of committing an offense, and the body of F was pushed down with her hand, and the right part of the outer flick part of F’s left flick.
Accordingly, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties concerning the dispatch of 112 report by police officers.
2. On December 5, 2015, the Defendant’s insultd Defendant B: (a) at the office of an Ansan Police Station-type office located in Ansan-gu, 10 (Salydong), Ansan-si, Madon-gu, Madon-si, Madon-si, Madon-si; (b) on the ground that the damaged person could not smoke; (c) on the ground that the Defendant prevented the Plaintiff from smoking; (d) on the ground that the Defendant was the victim; (e) before the civil petitioner I viewed, the head of the Madon team was the head of the Madon-gu, Madon-si, Madon-si, Madon-
B. The hump theory was expressed as follows: (a) the impule’s flag, the ageed flag, flag, and flag’s flag.
Accordingly, the defendant publicly insultingd the victim who is performing official duties.
Summary of Evidence
[Judgment No. 1]
1. Defendants’ legal statement
1. Each police statement made to F and G;
1. The photograph, tear, or tear photograph (the facts of the judgment No. 2);
1. Defendant B’s legal statement
1. The police of H. H.