The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The lower court appears to have determined the sentence, taking into account all the following circumstances, and there is no change in circumstances in the first instance.

In addition, in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the records and pleadings, such as the background and means of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's career, sexual conduct, environment, etc., the lower court's punishment is deemed appropriate and is not unfair to the extent that the lower judgment should be reversed.

The Defendant committed several frauds during the period of suspension of execution, and filed a request for a summary order by committing frauds, such as the former and the latter. On February 19, 2016, the Defendant immediately dismissed the request for a detention warrant on the former type of imprisonment (2016 order 648) on February 19, 2016, and again committed each of the instant crimes.

However, the defendant reflects his wrongness.

The crime of this case is a living-type crime and is not significant in amount of damage.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.