The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the Labor Standards Act for Unpaid Wages.

Criminal facts

The defendant is the representative of the Kafbook in Jeonju-si B and the user who operates a dog sales and a dog restaurant business using one full-time worker as the representative of the Kafbook-gu in Jeonju-si D in Jeonju-si.

An employer shall clearly state wages, fixed working hours, holidays, annual paid leaves, and other working conditions prescribed by Presidential Decree to workers when concluding an employment contract, and deliver written statements specifying the matters concerning the calculation method and payment method of wages to workers.

However, the defendant from May 25, 2015 to the same year.

6. E retired from office as C carpets until May 18, 2015 and the same year from May 25, 2015

7. Until May 25, 2015, when entering into each of the labor contracts with FF retired from work at C Ados shop and each of the labor contracts on May 25, 2015, it did not deliver to the worker a written statement specifying the matters concerning the method of calculating wages items, the prescribed working hours, the holidays under Article 55 of the Labor Standards Act, the annual paid leaves under Article 60 of the Labor Standards Act.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the purport that the working conditions of the labor supervisor’s statement with respect to E and F are only written, not written (Evidence Record 11 pages);

1. Article 114 subparagraph 1 of the Labor Standards Act and Article 17 of the relevant Act on criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Penalty fine of 200,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Part dismissing a prosecution under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (a) of the suspended sentence (a) (the Defendant who has no record of punishment repents his mistake, taking into account the overall details, result, etc. of this case)

1. The summary of the facts charged is the defendant, as the representative of the Kaffeng in Jeonju-si B and the representative of the Kafeng-gu in Jeonju-si D, who is a full-time employee, operates a dog sales and a dog restaurant business by using one worker.

An employer;