Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and for one year and six months, respectively.

except that from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 26, 2014, at around 23:30 on August 26, 2014, Defendant A suffered bodily injury, such as the mouth salll, the middle salll, the left salll, and the left salke of the victim’s face, after having been in dispute with the victim’s victim B (33 years of age) and the drinking value, Defendant A suffered bodily injury on the victim’s face with approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1) as above, committed an injury to the victim when the victim A (the age of 37) ran the victim’s face face while drinking the Defendant, and the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous thing in the table, was committed to the victim’s head, and the victim’s head was in contact with the victim’s head, and the victim was in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective statements in the first trial records;

1. The prosecutor's interrogation protocol against the Defendants

1. Each medical certificate, damage photograph (the defendant Gap asserts that there is a doubt about the causal relationship in terms of the part and degree of the victim Eul's injury. However, according to the consistent statement and diagnosis written by investigation agency investigation agency of the victim Eul, the causal relationship between the defendant Eul's act and the victim Eul's injury part and degree is recognized) shall be applied to the law.

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257(1) A: Defendant B: Articles 3(1) and 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B’s discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 (hereinafter referred to as the following circumstances) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants in a suspended sentence: Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Taking into account various circumstances, such as the confessions and reflects by the defendants, the fact that all the defendants do not have criminal power, and the defendants do not want punishment against the other party);