Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 5, 2017, around 02:30 on July 5, 2017, Defendant A: (a) francing the “D” head of the Victim B (S 46 years of age) and drinking in Young-si, Suwon-si; (b) francing the victim B (S 46 years of age) and drinking as a monetary problem; and (c) francing the dispute with one another, Defendant A’s head was caused by a beer who was in his place.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them, which could not identify the number of days of treatment.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the place of the above paragraph 1, was assaulted against the victim A (46 tax) as set forth in the above paragraph 1, and the victim’s head was sexually ill, and the victim’s head was sexually ill.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous objects and carried them, which could not identify the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Recording of the witness E's statement in the second public trial records;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. G statements;

1. Photographs;

1. Records of progress;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. As to the Defendants’ assertion on criminal facts under Articles 258(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendants denied the facts charged by the Defendants on the following grounds: (a) while the Defendants were in dispute with each other as monetary issues, Defendant A was able to take the sonship of Defendant B and take the sonship of Defendant B; (b) the Defendants did not have any fact at the time; and (c) the Defendants did not deny the charges.

However, in full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the defendants' assertion is not accepted since it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendants committed the act of recording the facts constituting the crime in their respective judgment.

① G, the main owner of the instant site, prepared a written statement to the effect that “Defendant A was at the time of fighting with the head of Defendant B as a beer disease, and Defendant B was at the time of Defendant B’s occurrence as a beer disease.”

The contents of the above written statement have not been observed.