beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On April 5, 2010, the Defendant: (a) purchased four insurance products at 4 places in the insurance company, including LIG fluter II insurance; (b) around September 6, 201, the Defendant purchased four insurance contracts; (c) around September 6, 201, at “D oriental medical hospital”; (d) even if it is necessary to be hospitalized as a minor injury, it requires long-term hospitalization and only short-term hospitalization; (d) however, from around that time to September 21, 201, the Defendant was the most likely that he/she received 16 days from the time of 16 days under the name of “LIG urine hospital” with a false certificate of entry and discharge; and (e) around October 11, 2011, the Defendant claimed insurance proceeds along with the total amount of KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000 won received from the victim under the name of the said injury; and (e) received the total insurance proceeds from the victim.
2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the court, the evidence alone submitted by the prosecutor was proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt as to the facts charged.
It is difficult to see, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
① The review reply on the propriety of the hospitalization period prepared by the Health Insurance Review Institute is not directly verified at the time of hospitalization, but mainly determined ex post on the basis of medical records, and it is difficult to readily conclude that the appropriate hospitalization period, which is determined in the above reply, is absolutely correct.
In addition, it should be considered that the medical personnel who directly diagnosed the symptoms of the defendant at the time of hospitalization can be judged the most accurately.
② Even according to the above reply, the examination and treatment of the Defendant in relation to the hospitalization of the Defendant in the attached list of crimes (hereinafter “the instant list”) 1 to 3.