beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three thousand won,00,000 won.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 30, 2020, around 02:33, Defendant A, after receiving 112 report on “sif rate” in front of Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (a) and the circumstances leading up to the assignment of the Dental Police Station D Boxes of Daegu-nam Police Station that called “sif rate” by the reporter; (b) and (c) the circumstances leading up to the need to stop and return to the Defendant; and (d) he heard to the effect that “the taxi fee was not 4,000 won or less; and (d) the taxi fee was not 4,000 won; and (e) asked the Defendant to pay the taxi fee and return to the Republic of Korea; and (e) he expressed to the above police officers one time, and (e) required the above F to return to Korea; and (e) the circumstances leading up to the need to stop and stop, the Defendant carried out the above part of the F Party’s first round back to the right hand.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.
2. Defendant B, at the same time and place as above, observed that the above Party A was arrested as a flagrant offender of the obstruction of performance of official duties by the security guards E and security guards E belonging to the Daegu Southern Police Station Police Station for the above reasons, and raised objection to the above police officers under the influence of alcohol and raised objections to the arrest of the above police officers in the above act of committing a crime of the obstruction of performance of official duties. Defendant B refused to comply with the warning given to the police officers on twice the shoulder of the above circumstances E as his hand, and was flickly f of the above circumstances F, and was flickly flick with the above circumstances F.
Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to police statements of E, F and G;
1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act
1. Commercial concurrence;