(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.11.27 2018고정922

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.11.27 2018고정922

재물손괴등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In July 2017, the Defendant first 51 years of age, and she was living together with the victims’ home from September of the same year. From around October of 2018, the Defendant she saw from around October 01, 2018 to live separately.

1. Damage to property;

A. On October 05, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on the part of the victim D(n) in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu; (b) reported to the police to the police and reported that the police officer would come to his house; (c) reported that the police officer “the police reported to the police” was “the police,” and (d) broken the two-way kitchen, one of the following, and one of the following, strings in the kitchen, and was cut off on the bicycle owned by the victim; and (e) damaged the repair cost of KRW 74,00 by destroying the rear wheels.

B. On 18:00 on 07, 201, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s property in an amount of KRW 90,000 at a market price and damaged its utility on the grounds that the victim D(W) was in dispute with the victim’s father B in Daegu-dong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 24 years of age, and that the victim’s part B was in harmony with the victim’s father B.

(c)

On 21, 2018. 02. 02.00, the Defendant: (a) on 21, 2018, on the ground that there was no opening of a victim D (W) who was in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, about 24 years old, that “a door opening L” was not opened by the victim.

“In the course of taking the desire to “,” the head of a small glass window on the front of the entrance was broken and damaged the utility of the goods equivalent to 20,000 won of the repair cost by destroying one copy of the goods on the front of the entrance.

(d)

On 28. 22:00 on 28. 20. 22. 22. 00, the Defendant called “a opening door” in the Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant was able to use the 20,000 won of the repair cost by inserting subvers and Gemans, etc. on the roads for the reason that the victim did not open the door in the entrance, and making it impossible for the Defendant to use the flusing correction device by inserting the subvers and Gemans, etc. into the flusle joints of the entrance.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2019.05.17 2019고정74

-대구지방법원 2014.03.06 2013고단4587

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.04.25 2018고정688

-대구지방법원 2014.10.16 2014고단3643

-대구지방법원 2019.02.12 2018고정1241