The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. On July 6, 2012, the Defendant did not enter the main points of the “E” operation of the Victim D (E) on July 6, 2012, and did not interfere with the victim’s main points management as stated in the facts charged.

B. In the same date and time as this case, the Defendant had already been sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million on the ground that he had been sentenced to a fine of KRW 5 million on the part of his husband G, which requires approximately six-day medical treatment for the victim’s husband G at the same time and place as this case. Since the crime of injury and the crime of this case are one crime or commercial competition, the judgment of acquittal should be pronounced on the ground that res judicata effect of the preceding judgment on the crime of injury is not applicable to this case.

2. Determination on the grounds for appeal

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court regarding the assertion of mistake of facts, in particular, the victim D, G’s statement, and each of the statements made at the lower court and the investigative agency of the victim D, G with a specific and consistent credibility, the Defendant may fully recognize the fact that the Defendant interfered with the victim’s main management business by force for about 10 minutes, including: (a) the Defendant entered the main points in the operation of the victim on July 6, 2012, when entering the main points of the victim’s operation; (b) holding the main external wall inside the main entrance in hand and spons, and taking a bath to G.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

나. 법리오해 주장에 관한 판단 기록에 의하면, 피고인이 2013. 2. 6. 이 법원에서 '피고인이 2012. 7. 6. 20:00경 피해자 G으로부터 피고인이 음식점 앞 골목에 의자를 놓고 앉아 있어 E 주점에 손님들이 들어오지 않는다는 항의를 받게 되자 화가 나 위 주점 안으로 들어가 따지려 하는데 G으로부터 제지당하자, 주먹으로 G의 왼쪽 손가락 부위를 1회 때리고 G의 손가락을 꺽는 등으로 G에게 약 6주간의 치료를 요하는 견인절편골절(제5수지 말절골 좌측)을...