logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.02.16 2016고정4000
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 17, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act, driving the above vehicle at around 18:40 on July 17, 201, and driving the two-lanes of the front C in the Geum-gu Busan, U.S., to turn to the left.

There is a central line, and there is an intersection where the left-hand turn is allowed at the time of the straight signal, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to observe the vehicle line and to make a left-hand turn safely while paying attention to the traffic situation on the front side.

Nevertheless, in order to pass a left-hand turn to the left-hand turn of a victim's vehicle Ei30 vehicle driven by the front line of the defendant's vehicle, the defendant took the part of the driver's seat of the damaged vehicle, which was left-hand left-hand pursuant to the Non-Protection left-hand left-hand turn, in front of the defendant's vehicle, and due to the shock, the damaged vehicle was placed on the apartment outer wall installed on the opposite side of the road in the direction of the proceeding.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the injury of the victim D and the victim F, who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, by the foregoing occupational negligence, to the victim F, each of which requires two weeks medical treatment, and damaged the damaged vehicle’s repair cost of KRW 3,046,88, and the next apartment outer wall repair cost of KRW 2,200,000.

2. No person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation shall operate any motor vehicle on a road which is not covered by mandatory insurance except for the motor vehicles prescribed by the Presidential Decree;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above Oral Ba which was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and time as the above 1.1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident statement prepared in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow