logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.05.29 2013고정251
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant were B Poter freight drivers. On January 27, 2013, the Defendant, at the same time, proceeded one way in the direction of network location in the direction of the construction site of the Samwon Corporation located in the village located in the village in the village in the village in the Donsan-ri in the Donsan-ri-si in the Donsan-si. On January 27, 201

There is a place where the center line becomes a yellow line so that it is impossible to turn to the left, and there is a vehicle in which the defendant normally overtakes the vehicle behind the same direction at the time. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle by checking the front and rear side well.

Nevertheless, a copy of the damaged vehicle C X-ex's right-hand side side of the defendant's vehicle, which is going to overtake normally by negligence of failing to do so, was received as the front part of the defendant's left-hand side.

The Defendant by negligence inflicted damage on the victim of the victimized vehicle driver D (the 46-year-old, female) for a approximately two-day medical treatment on the part of the driver of the victimized vehicle, and on the part of the victim E (the 22-year-old, female) of the same passenger E (the 22-year-old, female) for a approximately two-day medical treatment, and damaged the repair cost of the damaged vehicle to KRW 892,602.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, even when he was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance, operated the said motor vehicle by the Defendant who was not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the foregoing paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to actual condition survey reports, photographs, chassis, mandatory insurance inquiries, medical certificates, and estimates;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Selection of Punishments, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act.

arrow