logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2014.10.01 2014가합50241
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, who carries out the tesenal construction business, entered into a construction contract with the Defendant on the content that the Defendant will receive a contract for the interior and signboard construction of the Defendant’s stores at each coffee retail shop as indicated below.

3. 20. 1, 20, 20, 30. 1, 20, 20, 30. 1, 20, 20, 30. 3, 20, 20, 20, 30. 3, 20, 10, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 10, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 20, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 30, 20, 20, 30, 20, 203. 3, 20, 30, 10, 200, 00, 00, 20, 30,000, 10,000, 30,000,00

B. The Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 20,000,000 with the advance payment, KRW 5,000,000 with the payment, KRW 5,000,000 with respect to the G points in Gwangju, KRW 5,000,000 with respect to the E points, KRW 10,000 with respect to the I points, KRW 100,000 with respect to the I points in Gwangju, and KRW 5,000,000 with respect to the Busan K points in Busan, and KRW 60,000 with respect to KRW 5,00,000 ( KRW 5,000,000 with respect to the Busan M points in KRW 5,000,000 with respect to KRW 5,000,000,0000 with respect to the construction work, KRW 10,0000,000 with respect to KRW 10,000,000).

C. The Plaintiff completed the construction work of Gangnam A, E, Suwon G, I, Gwangju K, and Busan M, and received a written confirmation of the completion of construction from the business owners of each of the above coffee retail.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-1 to 7, Gap evidence 2-1, Gap evidence 2-3 through 7, Eul evidence 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the Plaintiff’s assertion of the cause of claim

A. The Parties’ assertion 1.

arrow