The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant, from around 2004 to September 2018, operated a taxi for business use in C Co., Ltd. with which the victim B had been in former service. From around 2015 to 2016, he applied for a personal taxi license and had an appraisal carried out by the victim with regard to the failure to obtain the said license due to lack of driving experience.

On February 25, 2019, from around 05:35 to 06:45, the Defendant repeatedly told the victim by putting his cell phone three times to the victim, and repeatedly saying, “The victim was the victim of the victim’s mobile phone, who was able to see. (b) the victim of the victim’s mobile phone,” and “prisoned the victim of the victim’s mobile phone.”

2. Determination

(a) Applicable provisions of Acts: Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-compliance with will: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act.

C. The Defendant was not subject to punishment. On October 1, 2019, after the instant indictment, the Defendant submitted to this court a written application containing the Victim’s expression of non-guilty to punish the Defendant.

Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act