The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) by the court below is too unreasonable as to the sentence imposed on the defendant (six months of imprisonment).

2. The judgment defendant reflects his fault.

The Defendant does not seem to have committed the instant crime with a conclusive intent to inflict an injury on the victims or detain the victims.

In the process of confinement, the defendant did not exercise the force to the victims.

In this court, the defendant paid 2 million won as living expenses, separate from the consolation money and the division of property claimed against the victim D in a divorce lawsuit currently in progress.

However, the crime of this case is committed by the defendant to inflict an injury on his spouse and her children living together with her spouse and her children, and is detained by threatening her spouse and mother with a deadly weapon, and the method of the crime is very dangerous, and the quality of the crime is not somewhat weak.

In full view of the above circumstances and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the argument of the instant case, including the scope of recommended sentence according to the sentencing guidelines of the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, the Defendant’s age, gender, and environment, the sentence imposed by the lower court is too unreasonable.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.