The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment defendant led to the confession and reflect of his crime, and the defendant did not want the punishment of some victims under the agreement with some victims, and paid some of the proceeds to the victims.

However, the crime of this case is a optical project that collects gold from the gold in Myanmar by the defendant.

As the victims can receive profits by means of exporting to Myanmar by filling the domestic vehicle waste marry, it would be 10 million won or more through fraud over a long-term period of time by deceiving the victims.

The above agreement with some victims has been reached, but a considerable portion of the amount of damage has yet to be recovered.

In full view of such circumstances and other various sentencing conditions as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.