logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.1.25.선고 2016고정2140 판결
화장품법위반
Cases

2016 Highly 2140 Violation of the Cosmetics Act

Defendant

A person shall be appointed.

Prosecutor

OO (prosecutions) and ○○○ (Public trial)

Defense Counsel

Attorney ○○○ (Non Line)

Imposition of Judgment

January 25, 2017

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

When the defendant fails to pay the above fine, the defendant shall be confined in the old house for the period calculated by converting 100,000 won into one day.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Reasons

Criminal History Office

The defendant is a person who operates ○ cosmetic shop.

On July 15, 2016: around 20: around 20, the Defendant displayed at the ○○○○○-dong, Seoul ○○○○○-dong - ○○○○○ Cosmetics stores for the purpose of sale, or stored or displayed for the purpose of sale, even though the Defendant did not sell or store or display (drawing) cosmetics for sample (drawing) for the purpose of sale. However, the Defendant displayed for the purpose of sale of 1,50 won per sample to customers who found the cosmetics for sample (drawing) on their own.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court (on the second trial date);

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on evidence and photographs violating the Cosmetics Act;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

Articles 37(1) and 16(1)3 of the Cosmetics Act (Selection of Fines)

1. Detention in a workhouse;

Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Order of provisional payment;

Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

Judges

Judges Park Jin-young

arrow