A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

A pipe, seized (No. 1), a lux lux Sheet (No. 2), and a lux Sheet (No. 2);

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 04:50 on May 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the entrance door door door in the coffee shop operated by the victim D in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu; (b) invaded into the coffee shop; and (c) stolen KRW 100,000 in cash, which was owned by the said victim and kept in the coffee depository.

2. On November 6, 2012, the Defendant sustained robbery, around 06:35, at the coffee shop operated by the victim F (53 years of age) located in Mapo-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Seoul, shouldered the entrance door door door door, intruded into the coffee shop, and applied water to stolen articles, which was discovered up by the above victim, and added him/her with a view to evading arrest, the Defendant saw the face part of the above victim one time and collected a dispute around him/her, and laid off the above victim with a view to evading arrest, and caused approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim.

3. On April 13, 2014, at around 07:20 on April 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) opened a door to find the doors hidden at the entrance box of the entrance door at the victim H operated by Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) intruded into the main store; and (c) cut off the cash amounting to KRW 700,000,000, which was kept in custody of the said victim’s bank.

Summary of Evidence

【Paragraph 1 of this Article】

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Response to a request for appraisal;

1. Each investigation report (request for appraisal by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation, reply to appraisal by the National Institute of Scientific Investigation), the accused and the defense counsel asserts that there was no theft of goods as stated in the decision of the accused;

However, it was found that the blood trace presumed to be a criminal at the place of crime was found, and that the results of genetic testing were identical to the defendant after taking the blood trace.

Inasmuch as there is no reason to obtain the defendant's blood trace from a criminal place, goods as stated in Paragraph 1 of this Article are the same as the defendant's decision.