logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.08.29 2019나51627
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are all dismissed.

2. Costs arising from an appeal and an incidental appeal shall be respectively.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance to be adopted by this court is as follows: (a) “21,373,000 won” of the 9th two parallel judgments of the court of first instance shall be “21,372,00 won”; and (b) “1,016,000 won” of the 3 parallel judgments shall be “1,017,000 won”; and (c) so, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and both the defendant's appeal and the plaintiff's incidental appeal are dismissed as they are without merit. However, the "21,373,000 won" and "1,016,000 won" in the disposition of the court of first instance are clear and correct as they are "21,372,00 won" and "1,017,000 won" respectively. Thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow