1. The counterclaim Defendant: 12,199,566 won to the counterclaim and 5% per annum from November 17, 2016 to August 10, 2017.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 13, 200, the Plaintiff completed each registration of ownership transfer for C’s 276/3,307 shares and 1/2 shares of the building listed in the attached Table No. 2 (hereinafter “the building of this case”) among the land listed in the attached Table No. 1 of the attached Table No. 276/3,307 shares and the building listed in the attached Table No. 2 of the attached Table No. 3 (hereinafter “the building of this case”). The Defendant is the husband of D of the above land for inheritance by consultation

850/3,307 Shares and 1/2 shares of D among the above buildings have completed each registration of ownership transfer.

D has completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the above shares owned C due to voluntary auction on May 23, 2002.

B. The plaintiff (or between E and E C, and the plaintiff is in a relationship of relatives with E (i.e., the plaintiff is the spouse of a male-born couple of E's wife).

A) Of the instant building, F’s business license for 109.14 square meters for 109.14 square meters was granted to the instant building, G Defendant and the instant branch office.

A. Of the above buildings, H (the trade name of H is changed to I and J) with respect to 74.92 square meters, he/she engaged in the said entertainment bar business or entertainment tavern business with a business license for entertainment tavern business.

However, E also seems to have participated in a certain part of the operation of the above H.

C. Since then, E filed a lawsuit against G to change the business license name of the said entertainment drinking house under the Changwon District Court 2002Gahap550, when a dispute arises between G with respect to the operation of the entertainment drinking house, and during that process, E was adjusted to lease the instant building including not only the space used as an entertainment drinking house to G, but also the space used as a entertainment drinking house. Since then, E suspended the operation of the entertainment drinking house, and G began to operate the entertainment drinking house in the said building.

However, there has been another dispute between E and G in relation to the operation of entertainment tavern, and E is the Changwon District Court 2003da9557 against G.