Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On June 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. at the Changwon District Court on June 24, 2016, and the decision became final and conclusive on June 24, 2016, and is currently under the suspension of

1. From September 8, 2017, around 01:20 on September 8, 2017, the Defendant attempted theft against the victim C, opened a door-to-faceless driver’s seat of the victim parked at the Masan-gu D Parking lot, Masan-si, Changwon-si, in order to steals the victim’s vehicle, and behind the vehicle proposal in order to steals the object, but it did not reach an attempted crime because it did not have any stolen object.

2. The Defendant attempted to larceny the victim F, at the time and time set forth in paragraph 1, discovered Gpool car owned by the victim, which was parked therein, and carried the vehicle into the said vehicle in the manner set forth in paragraph 1, and did not commit an attempted crime because of the lack of stolen objects.

3. On September 8, 2017, around 03:3, the Defendant attempted theft against the victim H was found at the victim’s JM7 car parked in the front parking lot located in the 115-dong, Haan-gun, Haan-gun, Hanam-gun, and did not commit an attempted crime because the Defendant was released from the driver’s seat of the said vehicle without locking in order to steal the goods by entering the said vehicle. However, the Defendant did not commit an attempted crime because it was discovered to the victim who was seated in the Madon and escaped.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H and K;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 342 and 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is that the defendant has the same criminal history as the defendant, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspended execution period. However, it is reasonable to recognize and reflect the defendant's depth.