(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.23 2015고단4056

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.23 2015고단4056

특수협박등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 17, 2015, the Defendant 11:40 on August 17, 2015, 2015, the Defendant driven a Crocketing taxi vehicle, which is a dangerous object, and continued to drive three lanes in front of the entrance of the E located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu.

In the process of changing a vehicle into a two-lane, the Defendant: (a) caused the victim FF (37 Doh) who was driving the vehicle on the left side of the Defendant’s side of the two-lane, and caused the victim to play in a one-lane; and (b) heard the victim’s desire to “acsation” from the victim; (c) caused the victim to feel a threat to the victim who continuously pushed the victim into the center line, and caused the victim to feel a fear, following the victim’s ozone, who was driving the vehicle in a one-lane manner, who was closely pushed into the victim’s right; and (d) caused the victim to feel a fear.

In the facts charged, the following facts are stated as follows: “I continuously pushed down the Defendant’s vehicle, and after the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, caused the victim to feel a threat and feel a fear, such as being frightened after the victim’s on the right side of the road, etc.,” and the Defendant continued to drive the vehicle, and caused a contact accident by being pushed down to the extent that the vehicle and the stoba face with each other. However, according to the evidence, the vehicle and the stoba shall stop in the vicinity of the central line, and make the victim feel a number plate of the vehicle and take a photograph, and it cannot be said that it partially dealt with the act of intimidation. Therefore, it is deleted from the facts charged.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement of F in the police interrogation protocol concerning the accused;

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. On-site photographs, an accident site map, a black stuff video CD, and a key surface photo (F’s each statement is considered as evidence where it is impracticable to make a statement on the trial date due to the impossibility of F’s whereabouts.

The statement shall be.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고정3447

-서울북부지방법원 2016.06.02 2015노2237

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2016.04.05 2016고정279

-서울남부지방법원 2021.04.14 2020고단6044

-서울서부지방법원 2016.08.26 2016고정799