logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고정3447
도로교통법위반
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fines, only 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No driver of any motor vehicle, etc. shall threaten or endanger other persons or cause any danger to traffic by consecutively committing two or more acts in violation of prohibition, or by continuing or repeating one act.

1. Defendant A is a person driving DMW R1200 RT as his duties.

On July 10, 2016, at around 17:54, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the central line over two occasions on the national highways No. 75 near Lyeong-gun E of Gyeonggi-do, and continued the violation of the station line, and (b) threatened other drivers, such as G low-speed vehicles and H horse vehicles, and caused danger in traffic.

Accordingly, the Defendant continued to or repeated the central crime, as seen above, and continued to drive the central crime.

2. Defendant B is a person who drives I BMK 1600GL as his duties.

The Defendant, at the time, at a place prescribed in the above paragraph (1) above, invaded the central line twice and continued a violation of the calendar, thereby threatening other drivers, such as G low-speed vehicles and H horse vehicles, and causing danger to traffic.

Accordingly, the Defendant continued to or repeated the central crime, as seen above, and continued to drive the central crime.

3. Defendant C is a person driving JMW F80GT as his duties.

At around 17:55 on July 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) invadedd the central line over twice at the places specified in the foregoing paragraph (1) and continued to violate the reverse direction; (b) threatened other drivers, such as K Spwit vehicles and H horse vehicles; and (c) caused danger to traffic.

Accordingly, the Defendant continued to or repeated the central crime, as seen above, and continued to drive the central crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each report on internal investigation:

1. Each comparison with the enemy;

1. Application of video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Articles and 151-2, and subparagraph 2 of Article 46-3 (Selection of Fine) of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: the Criminal Act.

arrow