Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of seven million won.
However, the above imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
At the end of June 2017, the Defendant: (a) had women D, known through Smartphone C, engage in sexual traffic with men who had contacted through C; and (b) had D receive money in the name of brokerage fees.
On July 28, 2017, the Defendant: (a) ordered D to engage in sexual intercourses with male G and sexual intercourses in the Felel located in Hasan-si E; (b) received KRW 40,00 as good offices fees; and (c) ordered D to engage in sexual intercourses in the Iel located in Ha in Hasan-si in Hasan-si in July 2017, 30,000 won as good offices fees.
Accordingly, the defendant arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of suspect examination of the police to G, D, and J;
1. The punishment of an act of arranging, etc. selective sexual traffic shall be concurrently imposed on a crime under the relevant Article of the Act and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as brokerage, etc. of selective sexual traffic;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;
1. Protection and observation, and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;
1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;
1. Advertisement (1 to 3 years) in the aggravated area (1 to 1 year), such as the promotion of sexual traffic (referring to the mediation, etc. of sexual traffic caused by business, giving and receiving prices, etc.) in the scope of punishment of 19 years or older according to the sentencing guidelines, and mediation by using a medium which has high radio wave, such as brokerage, etc. of sexual traffic;
2. The criminal defendant's sentencing decision is heavier than the criminal defendant's crime when considering the fact that he/she arranges sexual traffic through SNS, the criminal history and method, etc.
In 2016, even though the defendant had a record of criminal punishment of fine of KRW 7 million in the act of arranging sexual traffic under the several laws similar to this case, recidivism was committed.
In addition, considering all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, environment, and circumstances after the crime, it is ordered as ordered.