beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. A. Around August 2005, the Plaintiff: (a) entered Uzbekistan with the Defendant and completed the marriage report; and (b) entered Korea as the Defendant and entered Korea on August 24, 2008; (c) and (d) live together with the Defendant’s literacy funeral around September 2008.
B. The Plaintiff, from around A in 2008, operated cosmetics store in Uzbekistan, sold Korean products, such as Korean cosmetics, and sold them in Uzbekistan.
C. After that, around March 2011, the Defendant disposed of Korea’s property at the Plaintiff’s request and moved to Uzbekistan. Around March 2012 and around September 2012, the Defendant filed a divorce and a lawsuit for division of property against the Plaintiff at the court of Uzbekistan, but the court rejected the lawsuit. Around December 2012, the Defendant prepared a civil lawsuit against the Plaintiff at the Plaintiff’s home and the Plaintiff’s home and returned to Korea on March 2013.
After that, on March 2013, the Plaintiff filed a divorce lawsuit against the Defendant with the Uzbekistan court, and on October 30, 2013, while the Defendant did not appear, the Plaintiff was sentenced to a divorce judgment.
E. On November 27, 2013, the Plaintiff prepared and submitted an application for divorce stating “judicial divorce” along with a divorce certificate issued by the Masan-si Office and a confirmation of divorce, and submitted a copy of the Defendant’s passport to the person in charge, who was issued by the Defendant in FAX with his intent to engage in interpretation and translation at the time of marriage between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and the Defendant.
F. On November 27, 2013, the public official in charge of the Gu office, who received the documents for filing an application for divorce from the Plaintiff, entered the grounds for divorce between the Plaintiff and the Defendant into “condemy” by agreement.
G. Accordingly, the Defendant conspired with C on March 4, 2014, as if C were to display a telephone to the Defendant and use it for other purposes.