Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On November 23, 2012, A was sentenced to a two-year sentence of imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on December 1, 2012, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 1, 2012, and on June 14, 2013, a two-year sentence of imprisonment for a crime of fraud was sentenced to a four-month sentence and a two-month sentence of imprisonment for a four-month sentence, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 27, 2014.

Defendant

B On December 1, 2011, the Jeju District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of one year to a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act, which became final and conclusive on May 9, 2013.

Defendant A stated that “M is a representative director of M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “M”), Defendant B is a representative director of N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “M”), and the two companies are parties to the same business, and the Defendants are the representative director of the victim R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “victim Co., Ltd.”) through Q in Gangnam-gu Seoul, around January 10, 201, to the effect that “M is carrying on road works and hotel business in Uzbekistan,” and that “M is carrying on road works and hotel business in Uzbekistan, and it is possible for the said company to take over various projects in Uzbekistan and have all conditions, but if the advance payment business expenses are lent KRW 200 million for its operation fund, R will be able to get L to work for Uzbekistan.”

On January 17, 2011, the Defendants continued to hold the M Office located on the 18th floor of Seoul Telecommunication building, and said S, etc. stated to the effect that “M would be able to perform the project for remodeling of Uzbekistan U hotel, etc., and the initial funds are required, and the additional amount of KRW 400 million is changed. If so, not only the return of investment and earnings, but also the construction works incidental to Uzbekistan U hotel work, may be awarded in R, as well as the repayment of investment and construction works incidental to Uzbekistan U hotel work. In addition, until June 30, 2011, the Defendants would pay the principal in full, along with the interest on the said funds.”

However, in fact, the defendants are in arrears with the office rent and management expenses at the time, and the monthly salary of the employees.