(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.12.20 2019나107751

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.12.20 2019나107751

소유권말소등기

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

(b).

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification as follows. Thus, this is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil

The 3rd line’s “On March 17, 1993,” as “ March 27, 1993,” and the 3rd line and 5 lines as “ Q Co., Ltd. (Representative Director E).”

In the latter part of 4-1 2006, the project operator of this case added "the change of the company of this case to the non-party company of this case" in the second half of 4-1 2006. 4. e. 2. e. 2, "At the time of its establishment", "At the time of its establishment" in the third half, "At the time of its dissolution under Article 520-2 (1) of the Commercial Act" was deemed to be a director until the time of its dissolution under Article 520-2 (1) of the Commercial Act of December 1, 2015". The fourth line "after the appointment of each director of March 26, 2013" in the fourth line is deemed to be "at the time of its establishment, at the time of its establishment" and all of "the non-party company of this case to the non-party company of this case to the non-party company of this case to be a witness of the first instance.

In addition, “Class 29” in the last 6 line is deemed to be “Class 27.” The 7th line in the 7th line is deemed to be “ June 26, 2009,” and the 4 and 5th line’s “P is deemed to have been opened.” The 7th line is deemed to be “necessary to contribute donations” in the 7th 9,10 lines. The following is added to the 8th 5 line “the need to contribute donations.” (8) According to the instant letter of donation, the purpose of the donation is to expand green space that is reduced due to the instant project,” and the purpose was also to cancel the said project.

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in entirety.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

-상법 제520조의2 제1항

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2019.03.28 2018누63343

-대전지방법원 2019.12.06 2019나102435

-서울고등법원 2019. 03. 28. 선고 2018누63343 판결

-수원고등법원 2020.06.17 2019누10579

-서울고등법원 2018.02.05 2016나2066378