The defendant shall disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence against the defendant.

1. The summary of the charges is as follows: around March 31, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 17:30 on March 31, 2015, to players in the shopping districts, such as D business owners, in the building of Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, for the following reasons: (b) on the port line; (c) the President’s authorization for the AS of AS: (d) the CS: (e) the CS: (e) the CS: (e) the CS: (e) the Haknk’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Ma; (e) the Hak’s Hak’s Witness’s Witness’s Witness’s Ma

“Walwal. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. walk

F Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma Ma-dong Mahh-rihyp

This is because the f and F’s f’s f’s f’s f’s two North Korea Qack is distributed on the face by dividing the two pages of printed items, such as printed items in which the phrase “self-flob” was indicated, and damaged the reputation of the victim F, etc. by openly pointing out false facts.

2. Determination

A. Relevant legal principles 1) In order to establish a crime of defamation, a statement of fact must be made to the extent that the alleged fact is likely to infringe on the social value or evaluation of a specific person. Although a false statement was made, if the false fact does not infringe on the social value or evaluation of a specific person, it does not constitute an offense of defamation under Article 307 of the Criminal Act (see Supreme Court Decision 2004Do4573, Jun. 15, 2007). 2) An act of lowering social evaluation by using a mere abstract judgment or an insulting expression of an insulting expression as an insulting expression of an insulting expression, not an offense of insult, but an offense of defamation, not an offense of defamation (see Supreme Court Decisions 88Do1397, Mar. 14, 198; 87Do739, May 12, 1987; hereinafter referred to as "the expression or evaluation of the facts in the past or its spatial evidence").