logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.12.07 2018고단2376
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.

10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On April 23, 2018, the Defendant, at the C hotel located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, put about approximately 0.3g g of mert ctop (one name “prophone”; hereinafter “prophone”) which is a local mental medicine, on a gambling ground, administered phiphones by using a medication instrument made by throwing a spon as soon as possible on the disease containing water, after cutting down the bottom of the rophones.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with regard to D;

1. Requests for appraisal, replys to request for appraisal, and requests to confirm the identity of the detained suspect;

1. Details of mobile phone calls, investigation reports (reports on personal information of subscribers), investigation reports (report on the market price of phiphonephones), investigation reports (Attachment of relevant records), investigation reports ( Results of execution of a search and seizure warrant), and reasons for conviction of the accused against the defendant at the search site;

1. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the credibility of the D’s statement is credibility in the D’s statement that administered phiphones with the Defendant on April 23, 2018.

A. On April 23, 2018, D was arrested under suspicion of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. in an investigative agency. On the same day, the investigative agency seized two medications on D vehicles, and the Defendant’s DNA was detected as well as phiphone components from one of the seized medication agencies.

B. As to the above appraisal result, the Defendant dices around the hotel of Abed C on April 23, 2018, and d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d d

However, the above argument by the defendant is difficult to accept in light of the social norms, and it is also difficult to accept the defendant's prior to the Ald C hotel on April 23, 2018, but there is no dysculling of coffee.

arrow