1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff (appointed party), the appointed party C, D, and E:

A. Attached Form 1 among the real estate underground floors listed in the Attached List.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 13, 2013, the Plaintiff and the Selection C, D, and E (hereinafter “Plaintiffs, etc.”) set the instant real estate portion to the Defendant as KRW 10,000,000, and KRW 1,700,000,000 per month of rent, which are owned by them, as well as the instant real estate portion to the Defendant.

6. From 14. to 25. of the same year, the above lease contract has been implicitly renewed after the expiration of the above period.

B. By April 30, 2015, the date of the closing of argument in the instant case, the Defendant paid only KRW 8,700,000 to the Plaintiff, etc. as rent.

C. On November 21, 2014, the instant warden, stating the Plaintiff, etc.’s declaration of intent to terminate the said lease agreement on the grounds that the Defendant was in arrears with two or more vehicles, was served on the Defendant.

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there is no dispute, Gap 1, 2, and the purport of the whole pleading

2. According to the allegations and the above facts found, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate portion of this case to the plaintiff, etc., and pay the rent of 2,550,000 won for up to November 13, 2014, [1,70,000 won - [8,700,000 won - deposit of 10,000 won for which the plaintiff is entitled to deduction] x 1/4] and the above portion of real estate from November 14, 2014 to the completion date of delivery of the above portion of real estate 425,000 won (i,70,000 won x 1/4) x 1/4).

3. According to the conclusion, each of the claims of the plaintiff et al. of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and each of the remaining claims is without merit.