logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.08.23 2017가단25667
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant delivers to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list, and pays KRW 30,00,000 to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On October 12, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant to lease the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) as KRW 50,000,000 for the rental deposit, and KRW 1,700,000 for the rent month (including the rental fee for the factory room), and received KRW 50,000 for the rental deposit around that time.

On June 27, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant revised the above lease agreement to reduce the rental deposit of KRW 50,000,000 to KRW 30,000,000, and paid KRW 20,000 in the balance to the Defendant, and added KRW 400,000 per month to the existing rent. If the Defendant, a tenant, increases the deposit of KRW 20,000,000 in the middle, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to change the deposit of KRW 50,000 to KRW 1,70,000 per month as in the pre-sale agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) and concluded a lease agreement to set the lease term as until December 22, 2013 (hereinafter “the lease agreement”). In the event that the lessee continued to pay two or more rents, the lessor agreed to immediately cancel this agreement.

(Article 4 of the Real Estate Lease Contract). The Plaintiff paid KRW 20,000,00 to the Defendant around that time.

B. Even after the expiration of the instant lease contract, the Defendant renewed the contract and continues to possess and use the instant real estate, and did not pay KRW 2,100,000 each month from April 2014.

C. On January 12, 2018, the Plaintiff urged the Defendant to pay the monthly rent that is confidential, and notified the termination of the lease contract by serving a copy of the instant complaint.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the instant lease contract was lawfully terminated on January 12, 2018 on the grounds of nonperformance, such as the Defendant’s delay of rent, etc.

arrow