1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of disposition;

A. On November 6, 1970, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on September 27, 1973 (the President of the Military Service).

B. On January 9, 2006, the Plaintiff contracted for the registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff developed salt while serving in the military; (b) caused the left in the military; and (c) applied for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State; and (d) on May 29, 2006, the Plaintiff was determined to have failed to meet the grading standards.

C. On March 9, 2017, the Plaintiff asserted that it was different to the Defendant to the following purport, and filed an application for re-registration regarding “contribute in both sides”.

The right you: In the event that there is a pain between the entrance and the entrance, it is unreasonable to conduct the training in the new training center after entering the school.

The number of copies was repeated on the right ear, and repeated shooting training and physical unreasonable training have been conducted after the separation of the unit.

It has deteriorated, in particular, served in an inferior environment, such as combat shooting and night operations, which are dispatched to South and North Korea.

The Cheongnopopy disability has further deepened.

On the port side: Happy and Mappy training of Taekwondo, the left side of which was dried up and sent back to the front side during the training of Taekwondo.

On November 6, 2017, the Defendant determined that only the part of the left ear high-frequency part constituted the requirements for the application of soldier or policeman wounded on duty.

(hereinafter referred to as the "disposition in this case") the purport of the non-member decision on salt.

On November 15, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Defendant on or around November 15, 2017, and received the same decision from the Defendant on July 13, 2018, and filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission on October 8, 2018, but was dismissed on February 19, 2019.

F. On the other hand, the Court determined that the result of the physical appraisal was as follows.

Before entering the military register, the military doctor has been treated in the right ear from before entering the military unit, but has not been completely cured, and in the case of entry, the military doctor has a serious defect in the right ear.