logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.09.19 2013구합2687
상이불인정처분 취소
Text

1. On April 24, 2013, the Defendant’s revocation of the disposition that recognized the difference in the number of signboards escape certificates against the Plaintiff.

2...

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff entered the Army on March 28, 201 as B students.

After entering the Do, the Plaintiff appealed from the Do during which he was trained in the New Military Education Team, and after being transferred to the first and third regions of the 705 Special Military Service Corps, the pain has deteriorated as he was receiving special military service education.

Accordingly, on June 22, 2011, the Plaintiff was first promoted at the Armed Forces Dong-dong Hospital, and thereafter, on June 29, 2011, the Plaintiff received a diagnosis of the escape certificate of the permanent signboard (No. 4, 5, 5, 1,000, 1,000; hereinafter “the instant difference”) and received an operation (the method of removing the conical signboard between 4, and 5, 5) from the Kimhae Hospital on July 5, 201.

Since July 29, 2011 to September 20, 2011, the Plaintiff was hospitalized at the National Armed Forces Busan Hospital for the escape from a signboard, but there was constant pain on the lusium and left side bridge, and as a result, the MarI was again taken at the Kim Sea Center Hospital on September 7, 2011, and the MarI was found out during the 4th and 5th to receive a re-operation on it (No. 4 and No. 5) from the Kim Sea Center Hospital on September 22, 2011.

On the other hand, after undergoing shooting training on June 20, 201, the Plaintiff was diagnosed on August 5, 201 by the East University Medical Center as the symptoms of the Lee Jae-sung arose.

After the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on December 17, 2012 and on January 7, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground of the instant wound and the left-hand return to the lower-hand side, but on April 24, 2013, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff of the instant wound and the left-hand side cannot be recognized as the injury incurred while performing his/her duties.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant disposition” only for the portion that did not recognize the injury suffered during the performance of duties). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 5, 7, and 8 (including paper numbers, hereinafter the same shall apply) and Eul evidence No. 1;

arrow