logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.17 2015가합71439
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's respective claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the original network AH with respect to the size of 276 square meters prior to the AF, AG, 3,623 square meters. 2) After that, the AF was divided into the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1 (hereinafter “the instant real estate No. 1”) and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1(2) (hereinafter “the instant real estate No. 2”), and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1(3) (hereinafter “the instant real estate No. 3”), the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1(4) (hereinafter “the instant real estate No. 4”) and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1(3) (hereinafter “the instant real estate No. 1, 2, and 3”) and the real estate No. 1, 751 square meters prior to the Silsung City (hereinafter “the instant real estate”) and each of the instant real estate was divided into the entire real estate.

3) As to the entire real estate of this case on September 12, 2016, the Suwon District Court Seosung registry office received on September 12, 2016, the Defendants’ co-ownership share in attached Table 4 “Defendant” was acquired on March 10, 2017 through consultation with the Republic of Korea on May 9, 1969, and each of the Defendants’ co-ownership shares in attached Table 2 in the name of the Defendants was completed, including the registration of ownership transfer as to the shares in the name of the deceased H’s heir, and each of the above inheritors was recorded on April 11, 2017 as the receipt of the same registry office on April 11, 2017 due to the error of application under Article 69520 of the same registry office, and the registration of ownership revision was completed to delete the registration of ownership transfer as to each share in the name of AI, AJ, AK, and AL among the above inheritors’s successors.

Accordingly, as to the 5th real estate of this case, the attached Table 3 among the defendants.

arrow