1. It is confirmed that the defendant's disposition rejecting reappointment against the plaintiffs on June 29, 2009 is null and void.

2. The defendant shall be the plaintiffs.

(b) it is not desirable that the production of the material would not result in the study because it had been made before the e.g., the production of the material as a professor of the e.g., the production of the material.

(C) Although the ability and performance evaluation results are good, the contents of classes were out of the scope required in the dynamics major. (d) The suitability of major field and other * the suitability of the current National Art Gallery's work site * Unlike the professors who majored in the Republic of Korea, the head of the National Art Gallery's work site * the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site * the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site / the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site / the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site / the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site / the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site / the head of the Korean Human Art Gallery's work site / the

This is the category of his works and activities rather than the Koreanization (Dongyang) sector, which is inappropriate as a guidance professor for students majoring in Eastyang as a guidance professor.

* Materials used in the work are also used in libal materials, unlike other major professors (flassing, implied, and without color).

Although it is possible for a person who majored in the wintering to use the West materials, it is not appropriate to be a professor who should guide the characteristics of the wintering.

In the case of appointment, one year is recommended for the purpose of introducing various early language to students for a short term, but in the long term, the discrepancy between majors is considered to be a big problem for the establishment of the identity of students in dynamicization.

The evaluation criteria of name and detailed items (10 points) basic quality (50 points), academic research ability and performance (20 points), suitability for the field of major (10 points) major, and (10 points) personality and dignity (5 points) research performance (0 points) international thesis performance results (15 points).