1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 7,928,694 against the Plaintiff as to the Defendant and its related amount, from June 7, 2015 to January 25, 2019.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 27, 2004, the Defendant, while serving as a Army Master, has occupied the C Building D (hereinafter “instant official residence”) in Yangju-si, a military official residence in the Army as of December 27, 2004.

B. The instant official residence corresponds to Class 3 land (the area of a small and medium city, a city with a population of at least 300,000, and a city of urgency in the Seoul Metropolitan Area (Gyeong, Bong, etc.).).

The Defendant paid KRW 4,470,000 as deposit for occupancy at the time of moving into the official residence of this case.

C. The defendant acquired and disposed of several real estate while residing in the official residence of this case, and among them, the particulars of housing are as follows.

On May 21, 2006, the 1-si EF housing at the 1-si Government on May 21, 2006 as to whether it was disposed of after the date of acquisition of the ownership of the object, and on January 24, 2013, 2013, the 3-Do 4 Dong, Do-si, Schancheon-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Do-si, 5, Madong-si, Ga-si, Do-si, Do-si, Do-si, as of April 22, 2013, 6, Dong-si, Ma-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Ga-si, Do-si, Do-owned on May 29, 2013.

D. Around December 2014, the Plaintiff confirmed that he/she was owned by the Defendant, and confirmed that on January 9, 2015, he/she would issue a written notice of delay of eviction when requesting the Martial Army Commander, a commander of the Defendant’s military army, to leave the military army, who is the commander of the military army, to which the Defendant belongs, to leave the military army commander of the instant case, and that he/she would deliver the notice of delay of eviction. The Defendant

E. Relevant provisions applicable to the instant case are as follows:

Relevant regulations have been amended, abolished, and newly established several times, and ① the requirements for the occupancy of the "which does not have any person in the workplace", ② the provision which requires the withdrawal period of the person who has caused the non-resident's failure to move into the workplace within two months, ③ the provision which collects management fee increase fees if the person does not move into the workplace within the deadline, ③ the reasons why the person who is or is disqualified for moving into the workplace.