A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was an employee of the F mobile phone agency operated by E in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City from October 201 to July 2012.

1. On March 2012, the Defendant: (a) obtained the permission of the nominal owner; (b) made the appearance that appears to open a mobile phone using the personal information of the existing nominal owner at his/her discretion; and (c) obtained an open mobile phone and obtained it; and (d) received allowances from the victim E via the victim E., the Defendant was willing to receive the allowances due to opening.

On March 26, 2012, the Defendant opened a mobile phone with G from the above F agency formally after obtaining permission for the use of the name from G, and received one unit of a gallon set of the victim E’s market value equivalent to KRW 933,900, from that time to July 10, 2012, the Defendant received 37 mobile phones worth KRW 34,254,200 in total from that time until July 10, 2012, and received KRW 6,873,70 in total from EL Plus Co., Ltd.

2. On May 2, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document, or uttering of a private document, entered H’s resident registration number in the form of application for mobile phone admission using a pen tool, and entered the buyer’s column as “H” in the buyer’s column. At that time, at the same place, the Defendant can can be forged through a computer and sent the application for admission to ELP employees who are not aware of the forgery.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged the application for joining the mobile phone in the name of H, which is a private document related to rights and duties, and used it, and forged the application for joining the mobile phone 12 times in total as shown in the attached Table 2.

3. Violation of the Resident Registration Act.

A. On April 4, 2012, the Defendant, using the aforementioned F agency’s computer, opened to another person’s name.