Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a business resident of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government who resides in 301 Dong 903, Gangseo-gu apartment house.

1. On October 26, 2014, in order to discuss the issue of apartment pending issues in E’s restaurant located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D on October 26, 2014, the Defendant damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false information, stating that the victim F was the victim’s academic background (university graduate) stated in the candidate documents at the time of going out and going out in the election of the same representative election.

2. Definating;

A. On November 26, 2014, the Defendant made a copy of the documents requested by the head of the management office and employees of the apartment management office, and refers to the victim F in large voice while making a copy of the documents that the Defendant is deemed to have been engaged in the inspection, and the Defendant is able to remove the dogs, eye, and eye from the room.

“In other words, the victim was insulting.”

B. On December 4, 2014, at the management office around 09:00, the Defendant made a copy of the documents, and reported the victim F with the Defendant’s work, and the victim F, and “I am exhue up to the end of the death, and I am saw the victim as “I ambling up to the end, I ambling. I ambling. I ambling. I am.

Summary of Evidence

[Defamation]

1. Part of the witness G in the fourth public trial protocol (the part stating that the defendant's graduation from the victim F college is false);

1. Each part of the legal statement of the witness H, I, J, K, and L (the part of the statement to the effect that the defendant stated that the graduation of the victim F from the National University is false);

1. A certificate of graduation (the defendant asserts that there is no fact that he/she stated that he/she was false educational background of victim F, and the recording book in which a file recording the contents of conversation at the time is recorded is not stated in the contents mentioned in the victim F's educational background;

The argument is asserted.

Although the defendant does not state the contents mentioned in the victim F's educational background on the record, the defendant did not know the school that the victim F graduated from the victim G, H, I, J, K, and L.