Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B knife vehicle.

On August 15, 2020, the Defendant driven the above 01:35 on the 01:00 square meters, and led to the front road of the Da-dong of Gwangju Northernbuk-gu to the F church space from the E church space to the F church space.

At night, the location is where the center line is installed, and in such case, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and safely to prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and was driving by the victim H(20) of the victim H (20) who was making a right bypass from the left-hand G apartment of G apartment above the central line in order to overtake the electric kick, which was going on the front-hand side of the road.

I CBR125 R The front part of the vehicle was received as the front part on the left side of the Defendant driving vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim H, such as thrings in need of approximately eight weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim J (21 Doe) who was on board the above Oral Ba in need of approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of K's traffic accident;

1. A survey report on actual condition and photographs on the scene of accidents;

1. Each comparison with the enemy;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment for Crime; Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act for sentencing under Article 40 and Article 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Punishment Act are against the Defendant’s recognition of the instant crime. The Defendant, among the victims, has agreed with H only smoothly, that the Defendant did not have any record of being punished for the same kind of crime, and the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, and details of the instant crime.