Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment for a crime of fraud in the support for the development of the Sugwon method, and on April 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one month and two months of imprisonment for the same crime in the same court. On November 19, 2016, the Defendant completed the execution of each of the above punishment in Ansan prison. On December 30, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of fraud, such as computer, and was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won in the same court.

[2] When the Defendant came to know on July 20, 2017 that the victim C was aware of the fact that he had a meeting held in a usual manner through a mobile phone fluencing “s meeting” for friendship club on July 20, 2017, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the victim C was aware of the fact that he had a meeting in a usual manner, and that the victim was a victim of the Kakakao Stockholm message, and that he was a person who wanted in a usual manner, then he could have the victim

First of all, 200,000 won of the reservation will make up for 4 "hun" rooms on the face of the week.

The phrase “the meaning was made.”

However, the defendant was thought to use the above money for the cost of living, and even if he received the money from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to make up for the accommodation in which he would make a promise.

Nevertheless, on August 2, 2017, the defendant deceivings the victim and transferred KRW 200,000 to the Saemaul Treasury account under the name of the defendant on August 2, 2017.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by comprehensively taking account of the following favorable circumstances: (a) the circumstance that the Defendant committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; and (b) the amount of damage to the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; and (c) the circumstances agreed with the victim, etc.; and (d) the amount of damage to the instant crime during the period of repeated crime; and (d) the circumstances that were favorable to the victim.