Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 27, 2015, around 09:40 on August 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) requested a doctor E to change the diagnosis of an operation to an injury from a disease to a disease; (b) the said E refused such request; (c) the Defendant took a doping that he/she does not properly explain the records of X-ray medical treatment.

Therefore, the above E attempted to enter the hospital as the next medical care room of the treatment room for others without permission.

Therefore, the victim F of the above hospital chief's victim F was the defendant, and the defendant was pushed the above F, carried the f, carried the bat, and continued to carry the bat at the corridor, etc. of the above hospital.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the above E medical service and assaulted F.

2. On October 6, 2015, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on October 6, 2015, at around 10:55, the victim G, the head of the hospital, at the second floor and the special hospital room of the above hospital, on October 6, 2015, on the other hand, on August 27, 2015.

In the booming and taking a desire to suppress the victim, the victim was assaulted by exposing the victim's neck in excess of the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A H statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning investigation reports (related to video works taken on the spot);

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of violence) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The defendant asserts that the above actions by the defendant against the defendant under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act constitute a legitimate defense, since the defendant's above actions were to be defensive against the president of the hospital of this case and employees' unjust assault.

However, the foregoing time limit is limited.