1. The defendant stated the plaintiffs in the separate sheet No. 2 as "the difference between the court's appraisal amount and the compensation for objection".

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Business approval and public notice - Business name - A Housing Redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”): Defendant - Business operator: Public notice of Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 31, 2010;

B. Decision on expropriation made on December 23, 2016 by the local Land Tribunal of Seoul Special Metropolitan City: The object of expropriation is as described in the item of “subject matter of expropriation” in attached Table 2.

(2) In light of the purport of the instant claim and the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff’s claim for increase in the compensation for the obstacles was dismissed, and the Plaintiff’s claim for increase in the compensation for the obstacles was withdrawn. The Plaintiff’s claim for increase in the compensation for the obstacles was examined only on the land owned by the Plaintiffs, as well as on the land owned by the Plaintiffs.

However, the court appraiser assessed the land owned by the plaintiff E in accordance with the transaction comparison method (the share in the site shall be evaluated as a combination with the building), and according to this, the above plaintiff maintains the claim for increase of compensation for the above partitioned building in the application for change of claim and cause of claim, so this part shall be included in the subject of judgment.

또한 원고 F 소유 지장물 다만, 원고 F 소유 지장물 가운데 ‘근린생활시설(1층) 연와조 스라브 69.5㎡, 주택(2층) 연와조 스라브 52.92㎡’ 부분에 한하여 서울행정법원 2017아12474 증거보전 사건에서 법원 감정평가가 실시되었고, 수용재결 및 이의재결에서는 보상의 대상에 포함되었던 나머지 지장물{주택(지층) 연와조 스라브 6.61㎡, 근린생활시설(1층) 세멘브럭 스라브 5.06㎡, 주택(2층) 샷시 스레트 4.29㎡, 출입구(2층) 세멘브럭 스라브 9.12㎡, 화장실(2층) 세멘브럭 스라브 1.92㎡, 계단 콘크리트조(L=3.0m, B=1.0m) 1식, 바닥포장 세멘 콘크리트(6.00㎡)}...