The defendant shall be innocent.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2013, the Defendant, at around 23:10, injured the victim E (the 30-year-old age) who is a taxi customer in front of the D apartment settlement in Gwangju-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju-gu, and the victim’s body due to drinking and scambling, and opened the victim’s body over the floor, and opened the victim’s body as soon as possible for approximately three weeks of treatment.

2. From the police to this court, the Defendant consistently declared that “the victim was intending to pay a taxi fee without paying a taxi fee, and the defective victim did not assault the victim, but did not assault the victim, and the victim was vaind and vaind, and the victim was brated with vain.”

On the other hand, the statements made by the victim E investigation agency and the victim E investigation agency, who correspond to the facts charged, are not in accordance with the clear memory, but rather in accordance with the rule of experience or consistency as a result of the conjection of the statements more and more more and less time than time (in this court, the statement made to the effect that the circumstances of the case are almost not memoryd) and it is difficult to believe that they are in conflict with the entries of the record on the record submitted by the defendant in this court (On the other hand, E made a statement to the effect that how it was damaged to the first G District slope H et al., and the statement submitted to the police was made only to the extent that the body at the time of the case can not be divided. In addition, when the above record on the record on the record, there seems to be sufficient possibility that the victim would have gone beyond his own as in the defendant's lawsuit). The remaining evidence alone is insufficient to recognize the facts charged and there is no other evidence to support it.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case are without proof of facts constituting a crime.