A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On September 17, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of one million won for the crime of assault, etc. by the Seoul Central District Court. On April 5, 2013, the Seoul Central District Court issued a summary order of KRW 500,000 for the crime of assault, and on April 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million for the crime of assault, etc. by the Seoul Northern District Court, and on April 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million for the crime of assault, etc. by the Seoul Northern District Court, and on May 7, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for the crime of interference with business, etc. on May 21, 2013, and on May 21, 2013, the Seoul Southern District Court issued a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime of obstruction of performance of official business, and issued a fine of six times more.

Criminal facts

1. On June 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 03:57, 2013, the Defendant: (b) boarded the D taxi driven by the victim C before the Dowing Tax Office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; and (c) said the victim as “a person to be a community credit cooperative located in the Dong-dong market.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the taxi fee.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with transportation services equivalent to KRW 5,00,00 from the victim.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. Around 04:20 on June 9, 2013, the Defendant habitually committed a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual assault) the victim C (the 57-year age), who is a taxi engineer, left a taxi without paying a taxi fee and getting off the taxi in front of five-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and said, the Defendant was able to take the Defendant’s hand while demanding the taxi fee, going off the Defendant to the police station, go off the Defendant’s hand, go back to the police station, and go off the victim’s back to the back head, and divided the victim’s vessel into another bridge going on the body of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1..